- What is the difference between Assistable and Vapi?
- Vapi gives developers an API to assemble a voice agent from the STT, LLM, and TTS providers they choose. Assistable is the operated alternative: telephony, versioning, campaigns, and QA ship built in at published voice rates.
- Is Assistable or Vapi more cost effective?
- Assistable plans start with quarterly commitments scoped to your deployment, with usage charged separately. Voice charges depend on orchestration, TTS, the language model, applicable telephony and enabled add-ons; chat starts at $0.02 per AI message. See /pricing for the current rate card and any announced changes. Vapi's published pricing model is $0.05/min + providers at cost. The rate card explains the voice base and any additional charges for the providers and options you choose.
- When should I choose Vapi over Assistable?
- Vapi is the right call when you have engineers and want provider-level control. You can mix and match any STT, LLM, and TTS provider with your own API keys at zero markup, drive everything through a full API, SDK, and CLI surface including web calls, and use sophisticated transfer plans with AI-generated summaries and fallback behavior. Their published testing stack is the deepest in the category, with evals, simulations, voice and chat test suites, and scorecards, and they ship version history with diff preview and role-based access. If your team is building a bespoke voice product, wants its own backend running the business logic, and is willing to own webhooks, carrier setup, and Git-based config promotion across separate orgs, Vapi gives you more raw control than an operated platform will.
- How fast can I get a live AI agent with Assistable?
- Talk to sales about your workflow, expected volume and integration needs. Together we define pilot goals, testing and a rollout plan. Production timing is agreed around the deployment scope and your technical, security and procurement reviews.